SCR 369093 Part Confirm Despatch: Difference between revisions
(v1.0 - Issued.) |
(v1.0 - Agreed by customer.) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Client=DHLT | |Client=DHLT | ||
|LogNumber=369093 | |LogNumber=369093 | ||
|Date= | |Date=05/02/2020 | ||
|Requester=Denis Starodubov | |Requester=Denis Starodubov | ||
|YourName=Tony Walker | |YourName=Tony Walker | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Reason=The MCS product has been designed specifically to be one user per trip, and for that trip to be completed before moving on, as explicitly described in both the product documentation and the customer's solution design document. | |Reason=The MCS product has been designed specifically to be one user per trip, and for that trip to be completed before moving on, as explicitly described in both the product documentation and the customer's solution design document. | ||
Despite this, the customer does not wish to | Despite this, the customer does not wish to abide by this stated restriction of the product. They require that a despatch be allowed to be part-completed by one user, then for another user to be able to continue with it later, seeing what has already been completed by the first user. This is to allow the user to go on a break or finish work for the day without completing their current task. | ||
|Alternatives=The customer does not wish to hand over a terminal that is logged in under one user for another user to complete. Nor do they want to force completion of work before going on a break. | |Alternatives=The customer does not wish to hand over a terminal that is logged in under one user for another user to complete. Nor do they want to force completion of work before going on a break. | ||
|Changes=Currently, completing a trip, all items must be scanned or marked as damaged on the device. | |Changes=Currently, completing a trip, all items must be scanned or marked as damaged on the device. | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
Scope: | Scope: | ||
* Items (packages or pallets) marked as Damaged will be unplanned (under changes in progress). If both this functionality and the functionality specified here are enabled, once an item is marked as damaged, it may not be reset, as the item has been de-planned already. | * Items (packages or pallets) marked as Damaged will be unplanned (under changes in progress). If both this functionality and the functionality specified here are enabled, once an item is marked as damaged, it may not be reset, as the item has been de-planned already. | ||
|NO_COST=Y | |||
|EST=0.50 | |EST=0.50 | ||
|DEV=6. | |DEV=6.50 | ||
|TEST=1.75 | |TEST=1.75 | ||
|Implications=Existing operations using C-MCS may be affected by this additional functionality (LFS and TDL specifically). Care must be taken to implement these changes so that, if not configured to do as described above, the application still works in the same way. | |Implications=Existing operations using C-MCS may be affected by this additional functionality (LFS and TDL specifically). Care must be taken to implement these changes so that, if not configured to do as described above, the application still works in the same way. | ||
|Status= | |Status=A | ||
|Justification=}} | |Justification=Customer agreement of functionality}} |
Latest revision as of 10:19, 5 February 2020
Small Change Request (Analysis) |
|
Project/Log Number: DHLT / 369093 |
Date: 05/02/2020 |
Requested By: Denis Starodubov |
Prepared By: Tony Walker |
Change Category (SCE_WMS, CTMS, EPOD, PORTAL, etc): |
|||||||||
Describe the Change Being Requested: |
|||||||||
Describe the Reason for the Change (new requirement, s/w fix, problem management etc): Despite this, the customer does not wish to abide by this stated restriction of the product. They require that a despatch be allowed to be part-completed by one user, then for another user to be able to continue with it later, seeing what has already been completed by the first user. This is to allow the user to go on a break or finish work for the day without completing their current task. |
|||||||||
Describe all Alternatives Considered: |
|||||||||
List Program and Change Summary Required to Implement this Change: The process then does the following:
In either case, sending the "DESP_CONF" messages before trip confirmation poses issues:
Additionally:
|
|||||||||
Describe Risks to be Considered for this Change:
Scope:
|
|||||||||
Describe the Implications to other Customers: |
|||||||||
Requestor Sign off:
|
|||||||||
Justification of Approval, Rejection, or Deferral: |